Rigsby emergency motion

A curious kerfuffle in the McIntosh v. State Farm case.  Yesterday Cori Rigsby filed an emergency motion seeking to have the Court modify its order dealing with production of certain of her computer records to State Farm. 

I read over the motion a couple times, and it's somewhat confusing, but apparently among the records to be produced are several things that have alarmed Cori Rigsby greatly, leading to this emergency motion.  What all these records are, one cannot tell from the motion, but the motion does say that among the records that should not be produced to State Farm are, evidently, some of the claims files that were illicitly taken in the Trailer Lawyer and Data Dump days.  Amusingly, the motion says production of these records to State Farm -- which are under an injunctive order by Judge Acker in Alabama federal court -- would cause Rigsby to violate Acker's injunction and protective order, which keeps State Farm from actually viewing these documents.

Here's a copy of the motion for you to read for yourself.  There are a few exhibits, none of which are new, but in the interest of a complete record, they are provided below.    

Exhibit A, Judge Acker's injunction.

Exhibit B, consent order.

Exhibit C, permission for Mississippi Department of Insurance to view documents subject to injunction.  

 

Trackbacks (0)
Pings sent to http://www.insurancecoverageblog.com/admin/trackback/75368
Written By:Coast Boy On June 19, 2008 10:58 AM

David,
Please explain how Cori can ask to not turn over documents that she was already ordered to turn over to Judge Acker's court? If she is protecting these documents is she in contempt of Judge Acker's order because she has held onto something that was to already have been given up?

Written By:JDBerry On June 19, 2008 12:22 PM

CB,

It appears the "documents" were retrieved from the harddrive after being deleted.

It appears she deleted the information (but any information deleted, isn't necessarily deleted and can sometimes be retrieved) was retrieved by the second expert which puts her in a quandry.

Written By:ThirdSouth On June 19, 2008 12:55 PM

Where's Belle? Isn't she the one who is always contending that redacted portions of the Twisted Sisters' depositions and other unseen evidence supports them, rather than blows them out of the water?
If so, what is Cori trying so desperately to hide?

Written By:Interesting On June 20, 2008 3:06 PM

Interesting to look at the names of attys listed at the end....Mike Moore.....Scruggs. Can't be just personal stuff cause Acker is mentioned too many times......

Written By:Ironic On June 20, 2008 4:45 PM

My oh my, the sisters who bypassed legal discovery and took whatever private and confidential materials they wanted and sold them to the highest bidder, now want protection from the law to keep their documents private.

Irony after irony...

Written By:Public liability insurance On June 24, 2008 1:24 AM

Great post really nice info keep with the good work

Post A Comment / Question






Remember personal info?